Parents slam dress for three-year olds that says "I'm sexy and I know it"
Only the other day, TK Maxx got into hot water for selling a range of bibs, with the boys’ option saying ‘Smarty Pants’ and ‘I woke up this cute’ being marketed towards girls. And now a dress has sparked controversy after being shared online by the Let Clothes Be Clothes group. A party dress being sold by Australian website Ozsale for £6.85 has got ‘I’m Sexy and I Know It’ emblazed on the front.
Understandably, parents aren’t happy about a dress aimed at 3+ children having any kind of sexual connotations attached to it. It’s described on Ozsale’s website as being ‘beautifully designed clothing for your little one’ as well as ‘durable and stylish’.
Sexism aimed at children: Why its time to let clothes be clothes
he self-esteem and aspirations of girls is being eroded by messages that suggest girls are caring and shy, opposite boys who are strong and brave, according to the latest Girl Guiding Attitudes Survey.
What is equally clear is that we fail boys by diminishing the importance of empathy and kindness when we accept stereotypes that brazenly shout Troublemaker across t-shirts. It is an indictment of how our society devalues femininity when retailers fail to acknowledge boys are also capable of liking flowers and butterflies, dresses and skirts, love Frozen and idolise female characters like Princess Leia.
JOHN LEWIS has become the first major UK store to remove boy’s and girl’s labels from children’s clothing in a bid to reduce “gender stereotypes”.
Caroline Bettis, head of childrenswear at John Lewis, said: “We do not want to reinforce gender stereotypes within our John Lewis collections and instead want to provide greater choice and variety to our customers, so that the parent or child can choose what they would like to wear.”
School trousers or skirts for all: Children should experience equality
Cheryl Rickman, an ambassador for Let Clothes Be Clothes – which worked with John Lewis to remove its gender labels – are not in favour of forcing girls to wear only what boys were already wearing. “We need to stop girls feeling like they’re wearing a boy’s uniform because they wear trousers, which are more practical,” says Rickman.
She dislikes the motifs of sequins, hearts and flowers that are frequently found on designated girls’ school clothes and shoes because they perpetuate gender stereotypes, and is concerned that girls’ school trousers are often tighter fitting than boys’.
“It’s important to offer children a choice and recognise that each child is an individual. We want genderless clothing, not genderless children.”
Why are social conservatives so triggered by John Lewis's gender-neutral kids' clothing?
“Can we call it John Lewis anymore or does it have to be Joan Lewis?” trolls Piers Morgan. “Wicked beyond comprehension,” tweets a Catholic priest. “There are two sexes, MALE and FEMALE, no inbetween. I have two girls who DRESS as girls,” declares intersex-denialist and CapsLock fan Sir Loin.
While I don’t wish to make fun of trauma deeply felt, the special snowflakery on display here is rather amazing. What do these people want? Content warnings whenever there’s a risk they might come into contact with a toddler of ambiguous gender presentation?
This company wants your baby in high heels before she’s walking
A company selling pumps for infants is getting a lot of attention.
Pee Wee Pumps based out of Greensburg, Pa., sells high heel infant crib shoes for babies zero to 6-months-old.
Let Clothes Be Clothes, a UK group against gendered marketing of children’s clothes, posted about Pee Wee Pumps on Facebook earlier this month. The post attracted more than 100 comments, many saying the shoes sexualize children.
How a sexist T-Shirt harms us all.
Welcome to the world of everyday sexism in children’s advertising. Like advertising, and Gap, it is everywhere.
Watch any TV advert aimed at children and you will see girls in shiny princess outfits emoting into microphones and boys dutifully pushing fire engines. Go to the children’s section of any clothes shop and you will encounter primary-coloured stripes for boys and pastel polka dots for girls.
We are living in an age when even shapes are gendered. It is that ludicrous.
Cheryl Rickman, Let Clothes Be Clothes Ambassador, speaking on Good Morning Britain
Cheryl Rickman and Caroline Farrow join the studio to debate whether it is right for John Lewis to remove gender labels from children's clothing.
Tesco and Mothercare called out for sexist marketing of childrens clothes
On Saturday, Let Clothes Be Clothes shared an image from a recent Tesco campaign which promoted the brand’s latest range of school shoes. Here, they spotted that the footwear had been divided into ‘Airtred Soles’ for boys and ‘Sensitive Soles’ for girls.
What’s more, the boys’ shoes feature a yellow dinosaur on the sole, while the girls’ versions are adorned with a pink butterfly.
Unsurprisingly, the image sparked outrage among parents on social media dubbing the move ‘damaging’ and ‘controlling madness.’
“Tesco, are you kidding me?” one person wrote.
“Well you clearly got educated in your basic sexism so lets see how you do with basic maths. Boycotting your products in 5, 4, 3, 2.”
Is there a gender size gap for childrens clothing?
Strides have been made recently in the bid to breakdown gender stereotypes within children’s toys and clothing, with many retailers moving away from the traditional pink for girls blue for boys way of presenting kids products.
But could there be a gender size gap within children’s clothing?
The debate has been fuelled after a Twitter user posted on the social media platform, asking why there was such a big difference in the sizing of Marks and Spencer PJs for a 3-4 year old girl compared to a 3-4 year old boy.
“Just wondering what you think the big difference between boys and girls is that you feel the need to size their clothes so differently?” the post read.
“Both sets of pyjamas in aged 3-4. Why such a difference?”
M&S criticised over sexist clothes range
Campaigners have attacked Marks & Spencer for playing up to sexist stereotypes after the retailer excluded girls from a new Natural History Museum clothing range.
Let Clothes Be Clothes say the series of dinosaur-themed T-shirts and pyjamas made only for boys sends out the message that ''girls don't do science'' when both sexes should be encouraged to show an interest in natural history.
Francesca Cambridge, who co-founded the campaign and complained to the retailer and museum, said enforcing gender stereotypes places limitations on girls and boys, at a time when more girls are being encouraged to study science and maths.
Manchester Evening News
Sainsbury's under fire for "sexist stereotyping" in new Summer clothes range for children
Sainsbury's has been accused of 'sexist sterotyping' for the way its children's clothes are being promoted.
Campaigners are angry with how the retailer has branded its summer ranges as 'Playful Pieces' for boys and 'Pretty Adorable' for girls.
In a tweet to the supermarket, the Let Clothes Be Clothes group, a campaign to end gender stereotyping in the design and marketing of childrenswear, said: "Lots of your customers are getting in touch with us to say how upset they are about your sexist stereotyping - boys are playful, girls are pretty adorable?
"Can you change this please? How about 'Summer Playwear'?"